SBY aide plays down attempt to challenge revised state budget
Bagus BT Saragih, The
Jakarta Post, Jakarta | Mon, 04/02/2012 7:53 PM
Albert Hasibuan: Presidential adviser. Kompas/Arbain
Rambey
Newly installed
presidential adviser Albert Hasibuan downplayed on Monday planned efforts to
present a challenge before the Constitutional Court (MK) regarding the revised
2012 State Budget law, which has been considered controversial by many due to
an article allowing the government to increase fuel prices.
Albert claimed that no
single article within the law, which had just been passed by the House of
Representatives on Saturday, was against the 1945 Constitution.
“I have learned that
Yusril plans to file a judicial review to challenge the law, but I think his
arguments are weak,” Albert said at his office, referring to state
administrative expert and former law and human rights minister Yusril Ihza
Mahendra.
“The law allows the
government to increase the fuel price under certain conditions, and if [action]
must be taken, that would only be for the sake of the people,” he added. “Why
do you challenge a law that was created for the sake of the people’s welfare?”
Yusril and opposition
politicians have considered the law’s article 7 clause 6A unconstitutional and
against the Constitution because it allows the government to freely determine
subsidized-fuel prices under market mechanisms.
The clause says that the
government has the authority to increase the price of subsidized fuels if the
Indonesian Crude Price (ICP) increases or decreases by 15 percent on average
compared to the ICP assumption of US$105 within the past six months.
They believe it is
against Article 33 the 1945 Constitution, which states that all natural
resources are to be controlled by the state and be used for the people’s
welfare.
Yusril and his team
filed the judicial review with the MK later on Monday.
Albert said the Law and
Human Rights Ministry had been gearing up to face the challenge. “We will prove
that the Revised State Budget is for the people’s welfare and is thus in line
with Article 33 of the Constitution,” he said.
i like it
ReplyDelete